Skip to content

Full report sample

Evidence, guidance, and a controlled retest plan.

See the complete eight-part structure before paying. The report explains your existing free result, adds selected style experiments, and gives you a way to compare them under the same conditions.

View sample Run free analysis

Full LookRange Analysis

Your evidence, translated into a practical plan.

Synthetic sample
Structure
76.4
LookRange
70.8-79.5
Confidence
86.3
Generated
2026-09-13
Provisional Beta estimateDeterministic numeric snapshotNo original photos in the report

Free result

Quick Scan, three-view LookRange, confidence, the main variance driver, and core explanations remain complete before payment.

Paid report

A one-time $9.99 report adds deeper evidence, chosen style modules, prioritized actions, and a 30-day retest plan. It adds depth to the explanation rather than accuracy to the score.

Know what the extra explanation helps you decide.

Why do my photos disagree?

See which differences come from the views, which appear stable, and which remain uncertain.

What can I actually change?

Separate camera setup from reversible style choices, then test one variable at a time.

Which style direction should I test?

Get selected hair, brow, makeup, glasses, and facial-hair modules with reasons and tradeoffs.

How will I know it helped?

Use a controlled same-version retest instead of comparing unrelated selfies from different conditions.

Complete report sample

Inspect every chapter and recommendation.

This synthetic fixture demonstrates the report contract and layout. Its numbers do not prove analyzer accuracy, and its style advice does not describe a real person.

Full LookRange Analysis

Your evidence, translated into a practical plan.

Synthetic sample
Structure
76.4
LookRange
70.8-79.5
Confidence
86.3
Generated
2026-09-13
Provisional Beta estimateDeterministic numeric snapshotNo original photos in the report

Chapter 01

Your LookRange at a glance

The report separates stable cross-view evidence from photo conditions, then turns your selected style priorities into reversible tests.

Your clearest next step is a controlled presentation experiment.

Strongest evidence
All accepted views contribute independently to the structure estimate and supported range.
Main opportunity
The first opportunity is to stabilize lighting consistency before comparing styling changes.

Chapter 02

Why your three photos differ

The accepted photos are related observations, not interchangeable copies, so their differences remain visible in the report.

Front
74.8
Left angle
71.9
Right angle
77.2
The views carry different support
the left angled view provides the least photographic support and deserves the first controlled retake.
Evidence: The deterministic photo snapshot keeps every accepted view separate.
The main source of change
Exposure and side-to-side light changed most across the accepted views.
Evidence: The engine compares cross-view structure with photographic and controllable signals.

Chapter 03

Relatively stable structure

The structural reading combines normalized visible relationships across accepted views and bounds unusually influential evidence.

Cross-view structural support
The estimate is assembled from multiple controlled angles rather than copied from any individual Photo Score.
Evidence: Normalized structural relationships are compared across every accepted view.
Shape profile for styling
The current profile suggests a oval outline and remains a Beta styling hypothesis.
Evidence: Only categorical cross-view geometry is retained for styling, not landmarks or original photos.

Styling profile

Oval hypothesis

moderate cross-view support. This is a styling hypothesis, not a diagnosis.

Chapter 04

Photo conditions and controllable presentation

Photo conditions and presentation choices remain separate from structure so each experiment has a clear variable.

Repeatable camera position
Matching lens height and distance reduces projection changes that can otherwise resemble a structural difference.
Evidence: Camera setup remains a controllable source of variation across the accepted views.
Change one styling variable
Keep light, camera, expression, and framing stable when comparing hair, brow, makeup, eyewear, or facial-hair changes.
Evidence: A controlled comparison makes the visual effect easier to attribute to the selected style change.

Chapter 05

Personal style guidance

These are reversible styling hypotheses based on cross-view geometry and your stated goals, direction, upkeep, and focus areas.

HairShape the hair silhouette

Most silhouette families remain plausible, so prioritize a controlled frame that matches your desired finish and upkeep.

The aim is a composed professional presence with a clearer and more defined finish, using silhouette and volume placement as reversible variables.

Basis: The cross-view profile suggests a oval outline with moderate support.

Tradeoff: This direction benefits from regular shaping and occasional product or tool use.

supportedmoderate upkeep
BrowsRefine the brow line

Keep the natural direction, clean only distracting edges, and add definition gradually through the tail.

A controlled brow line can support a composed professional presence with a clearer and more defined finish without changing the underlying structure.

Basis: The cross-view profile suggests balanced forehead balance and balanced jaw balance.

Tradeoff: This direction benefits from regular shaping and occasional product or tool use.

supportedmoderate upkeep
MakeupTest makeup placement

Start with placement rather than shade: keep the complexion finish consistent and change definition around only one feature at a time.

A controlled placement test can support a composed professional presence with a clearer and more defined finish while keeping the comparison easy to interpret.

Basis: The analyzer does not measure skin tone or product compatibility, so shade selection is intentionally left open.

Tradeoff: This direction benefits from regular shaping and occasional product or tool use.

exploratorymoderate upkeep
GlassesCompare frame geometry

Start with a medium-scale frame, then let your intended finish determine whether the rim feels softer or more defined.

Frame shape is a reversible way to test a composed professional presence with a clearer and more defined finish around the eye and brow area.

Basis: The cross-view profile suggests a oval outline with moderate support.

Tradeoff: Frame scale, bridge fit, comfort, and prescription needs should override a purely visual preference.

supportedmoderate upkeep

Chapter 06

Your top personalized actions

Three prioritized experiments connect the strongest available evidence to a specific next step.

  1. 1

    Stabilize lighting consistency

    light effort

    This factor produced the clearest change across the accepted evidence and should be controlled before deeper comparison.

    Repeat the capture with soft even light, matched framing, and the same relaxed expression.

    Evidence: Exposure and side-to-side light changed most across the accepted views.

  2. 2

    Strengthen the weakest capture

    light effort

    A stronger weakest view reduces avoidable uncertainty without asking you to change your appearance.

    Retake the left angled view at eye level with steadier focus and balanced ambient light.

    Evidence: The deterministic photo snapshot identifies this view as the least supported accepted capture.

  3. 3

    Shape the hair silhouette

    moderate effort

    The aim is a composed professional presence with a clearer and more defined finish, using silhouette and volume placement as reversible variables.

    Most silhouette families remain plausible, so prioritize a controlled frame that matches your desired finish and upkeep.

    Evidence: The cross-view profile suggests a oval outline with moderate support.

Chapter 07

Your 30-day same-version retest

Use the same engine and a repeatable setup after about one month so the comparison stays interpretable.

Prepare the reference

  1. 1Save a reference capture with the current styling and write down the camera, light, and distance.
  2. 2Choose the single recommendation you want to test before changing products, tools, or several style variables.
  3. 3Keep the reference and experiment images private unless you intentionally choose to share them.

Run the experiment

  1. 1Make the selected change and photograph it under the same relaxed expression and capture setup.
  2. 2Repeat the front and angled views only after the styling variable feels stable and repeatable.
  3. 3Compare consistency and preference before deciding whether the change belongs in your routine.

Success means

A useful change should feel repeatable, fit the intended context, and remain preferable across more than one controlled view.

Chapter 08

Evidence, confidence, privacy, and limits

The report explains available evidence and uncertainty; it does not convert appearance into a universal verdict.

What supports this report

  • The numeric snapshot comes only from the deterministic multi-view engine.
  • The style profile retains categorical geometry and user-selected preferences rather than original images.
  • Every styling recommendation includes its evidence level, maintenance expectation, and practical tradeoff.

What it cannot establish

  • The analyzer remains a Beta estimate and has not completed real-participant blind validation.
  • Style suggestions are hypotheses for comparison, not rules about what you should look like.
  • The report does not infer skin tone, hair texture, product compatibility, personal attributes, or protected traits.
  • Original photos are not sent to the report language model or stored with the report.
Numeric authority
Deterministic engine only
Language mode
deterministic fallback
Report engine
LR-REPORT-2.0.0
Reproducibility key
lr3-c4f27a91

Privacy and report data contract

What enters the report service

Review details

Only the deterministic summary, a categorical styling profile, and the preferences you select.

Excluded
Original photos, full landmarks, embeddings, face templates, and inferred protected traits.
Kept separate
Deterministic numbers and optional explanatory language use separate validated fields.

Frequently asked questions

Does the paid report replace the free LookRange result?

No. Quick Scan, three-view LookRange, confidence, variance driver, and core explanations remain free. The paid report adds deeper interpretation, selected style modules, prioritized actions, and a retest plan.

How are hair, makeup, brow, glasses, and facial-hair suggestions chosen?

They combine a low-dimensional cross-view geometry profile with the goal, style direction, upkeep level, and focus areas you select. Suggestions are framed as reversible experiments, not fixed rules.

Does the language model change my scores?

No. Scores, LookRange, confidence, and report metadata come from deterministic code. A language model may explain approved evidence, but it cannot create or modify numeric results.

Are my original photos sent with the paid report?

No. The report request contains only a whitelisted low-dimensional summary, categorical styling profile, and your stated preferences. Original photos, landmarks, embeddings, and face templates are not included.

Is this professional styling or medical advice?

No. It is a Beta appearance-context tool. Styling suggestions are comparison hypotheses, and comfort, product compatibility, professional requirements, and personal preference should take priority.

Start with the complete free result.

Paid report checkout is not available right now. The free three-view result remains available.

Run free analysis